
|
In order to get complete and trustworthy opinion on the DIS 29500 from various interested parties in Poland Polish NB conducted wide and open public consultancies. Several questions we asked as a part of these consultancies are based on ISO/IEC Directives and constitute MINIMAL REQUIREMENTS for ISO/IEC standards. They include:
Polish NB considered carefully all PRO’S and CON’S comments submitted during the consultancy period. In the conclusion, we have not identified ANY obvious non-compliance of the standard with MINIMAL REQUIREMENTS. Therefore, taking into account specific One-Step-Approval ‘Fast Track’ procedure, Polish NB is in favour to say ‘yes’ to DIS 29500 submitting only general and few editorial comments. |
No specific change proposed |
|
Technical problems have been pointed out in relation to not using several W3C recommendation in OOXML Draft. This relates specifically to: W3C CSS3 Color Module 2.18.46 section, p .2521) W3C ITS 1.0 (2.3.3.24 section, p. 1051) W3C RDF/XML Syntax section 10, p. 218) W3C MathML 2.0 (7.1 section, p. 747) W3C SMIL 2.1 (4.6 section, p. 3854) W3C SVG 1.1 ( 15.2.17 section, p. 158, 2.18.46 section, p. 2521) Polish NB expresses their opinion that according to the JTC1 Directive, the ISO International Standard is required to be in compliance with existing ISO and/or IEC standards (see the Definition 3.3. of IS as taken out from ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 Rules for the structure and drafting of International Standard s). We have not recognized any incompliance of the Draft with other ISO and/or IEC standards. However, W3C recommendations and their applicability should be considered as a base for further development during routine standard maintenance process as it is usually done in JTC1. |
No specific change proposed |
|
Over 300 errors in XML examples have been identified and confirmed. The list of errors was submitted to Polish NB, however recognized to be the same as presented in: http://surguy.net/articles/ooxmlvalidationandtechnicalreview.xml |
According to Microsoft Poland those errors are being now under correction. Polish NB draws the Project Editor’s attention to be sure the corrections will be done. |
5.9.2.1 Page 339 (655 PDF) line 10 and 11 |
EMUs unit exchange ratios are wrong (one zero is skipped in both entries): 91440EMUs/US inch and 36000 EMUs/cm |
Should read: 914400EMUs/US inch and 360000 EMUs/cm |